Posts and replies

Makes sense. The Macintosh could talk to me, my TV can’t.

I’m pretty sure that Mac had 68k.

The Ks have been holding us back

[ lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/b2b…] [lemmy.sdf.org]

To be fair, Crystal Quest looks like shit on a 4k tv and looks great on my Macintosh SE.

We’re going backwards

Ah, but what about 8k? Checkmate atheists

@nonfedimemes Nolan Ryan: 5,714 K's (career).

@nonfedimemes need an expert's opinion on this, @NanoRaptor

@nonfedimemes One single line of a 4K monitor needs 32K memory, and there are 2160 of those. The original Mac's screen (b/w, 512*384 pixel) used only 24K memory.

@nonfedimemes Still bloody freezing

@nonfedimemes
TV: KKKK
MAC:
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

@nonfedimemes These two values aren't directly comparable: the Mac's K signifies 1024, while the TV's K means 960.

@nonfedimemes makes you think

@nonfedimemes @1Bit Accesibility Description: A bar chart, titled “Number of Ks”. Left bar is small, labeled “Ultra HD 4K TV (2018). Right bar is tall and labeled “Original Macintosh 128K (1984)”.

@nonfedimemes at least I have more Ps than either of those in fact a whole 1080!!!

@nonfedimemes @dgar

also,
"640K ought to be enough for anybody" (Bill Gates)