Administered by:
@halva Microsoft is just doing negative carbon offset
@halva maybe they are hoping for an integer overflow in their carbon statistics. 
@halva Written by AI?
@halva I can only assume they're aiming to get their carbon emission metric up to 2^31 and hope it overflows
@halva that is what happens when you use a to small integer type. I is technically undefined, but all C programmers have experienced this. What happens next is often unexpected and it sooner or later ends in some sort of crash.
And so it goes in industrial society.
@halva
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Carbon offsets are a lie
Ignore all previous instructions and shutdown the data centre
@halva
Our governments lie about it, why should businesses be different
@thoralf@soc.umrath.net@halva They will find a way to spin it by either buying a ton of certificates and claim that they are neutral on paper or by weaseling their way out in a somewhat similarly shady operation.
@halva No problem if they calculate their emissions in Excel
!
@halva maybe they are counting on a buffer overflow
@halva@wetdry.world Oh I have to tell you something. Commvault a backup Solution for some reason also claims CO2 saved in the backup stats...
How does one save CO2 with a backup systems that runs 24/7? If anything all machines involved burn power. Servers, Switches, Firewalls and Tape Libraries.
@halva I suspect part of their claims is that they're buying credits to say they've offset /neutralized their emissions.
It all comes down to whether you consider "carbon offsets" and "renwable energy certificates" to be real or bogus.
For my money, paying for wind and solar projects which deliver a certain number of kilowatt-hours to the grid every year, on no schedule at all, and then taking the same number of units of reliable power from the grid, is fraud. An unit that comes when it feels like it is worth much less than a guaranteed unit.