wetdry.world is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
We are a community focused on gaming, tech, entertainment, and more.

Administered by:

Server stats:

745
active users

Public

@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world I'm surprised they didn't lose the source code

Quiet public

@icantcode @GlitchyZorua Only some of it, it seems.

Public

@GlitchyZorua It's just 4.x.

The one the world remembers is 6.x

Public

@GlitchyZorua Have you visited freedos.org/? and it's not just for reference.

www.freedos.orgThe FreeDOS Project
Public

@GlitchyZorua
it was licensed under MIT before though, wasn't it?

Quiet public

@GlitchyZorua @Bugspriet Finally, the German government can go full FOSS!

Quiet public

@GlitchyZorua
I hope we see 6.22 at some point. And dare I say, old Windows?

Public

@GlitchyZorua it is for a while

Public

@GlitchyZorua this is the best (in fdisk.c) 😅

Public

@jackf723 Ok re: your last boost, your next assignment is to install it on my Lenovo, as i want to start using it full time #MS-DOS 4.0 haha.

Public

@CamstoneFaux @GlitchyZorua I seens it! Very nifty.

Public

@GlitchyZorua Open sourced and MIT licensed!

Public

@GlitchyZorua 7.0 when T_T

Public

@GlitchyZorua without the corresponding gwbasic though 😾

Quiet public

@GlitchyZorua And it's under an MIT license!

Public

@GlitchyZorua "But does it run MS-DOS?"

Public

Microsoft *owns GitHub* and even they can't turn off a repo's pull requests. I guess the technology for that is actually impossible.

“[…] please don’t send Pull Requests suggesting any modifications to the source files”

github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS

@GlitchyZorua

The original sources of MS-DOS 1.25, 2.0, and 4.0 for reference purposes - microsoft/MS-DOS
GitHubGitHub - microsoft/MS-DOS: The original sources of MS-DOS 1.25, 2.0, and 4.0 for reference purposesThe original sources of MS-DOS 1.25, 2.0, and 4.0 for reference purposes - microsoft/MS-DOS
Public

@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world and also that weird multitasking dos 4.0 beta it seems

Public

@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world actually no that's just the binaries, still kinda cool to have a barely official release

Public

@GlitchyZorua not directly true - only Version 4.0 was released just now.

1.25 and 2.0 were released in 2018.

Public

@GlitchyZorua now compile it with free software.

Public
@GlitchyZorua huh, i believe some of the super early versions of MS-DOS were already open source, interesting that they're releasing the source code for some later versions

watch someone find a massive security bug that's somehow still in windows today in the next couple hours
Public

@GlitchyZorua @graydon [octodon.social]

Not DOS 3.x? Not DOS 5.x? Not the 2 DOS versions I've actually run?

What a strange line to draw. I wonder what the significance is.

Public

@GlitchyZorua Well, whew. Now I don't need to worry about hiding my diskettes from the feds.

Public

@GlitchyZorua Wow literally MINUTES from me talking about how it'll be difficult to make a custom OS (for a project I'm working on)

Public

@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world

congratulations to
@starfrost@wetdry.world and the great work of people at microsoft again!

Public

@GlitchyZorua oh the flash backs..breaking up games into directories and hiding them from teachers

Public

@GlitchyZorua making evryones screen saver over the local network mulder and scully

Public

@GlitchyZorua digital life was so simple then

Public

@GlitchyZorua no ads, just message boards curated to your own specifications or as we like to call it the fediverse

Quiet public
Public

@GlitchyZorua Now we can finally check whether John Doe was right!!

youtube.com/watch?v=srRigD-8oF

Public

@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world this has been a thing for a while, but i think they recently added dos 4

Public

@tauon yea lemme fix dat

Public

@GlitchyZorua Microsoft employee here working on FOSS:

YAAAAY :3

Public

@GlitchyZorua I hope they open-source 6.22. They probably don't because I think it's in use in some RTOS applications and also likely some encumbrances. You'd be surprised how many vendors have code in DOS.

Yes, DOS is often used as a real-time OS. It makes a lot of sense. If you don't have many TSR's running, it works great for that.

Public
I seem to remember a discussion back when they first released the sources about there being some licensing issue with it where there were parts of v6 that couldn't be released due to copyright issues
I could have completely imagined that though, that's entirely possible
Public

@GlitchyZorua DOS has been source-available for a number of years now, they just recently added 4.0.

idk why they haven't added 6.22 yet but there's probably some deps that prevent this

Public
@sterophonick @GlitchyZorua 1.25 and 2.0 was source available for a number of years, then they gave it MIT license when MS uploaded them to github.

nice to see 4.0 (ex-3.40) has the same folder structure as later seen in the incomplete leak of 6.0
Quiet public

@sterophonick @GlitchyZorua it's funny cuz from what i have seen, MS-DOS 3, 5(.02) and 6(.20/22) were/are the more common used, so they literally released the ones that most peoples are not interested in :blabcat:

(also if i recall, they are not compilable in the version they are released, don't remember if it's because of the code, the license or both)