THIS IS NOT A DRILL
#msdos 4.0 JUST GOT OFFICIALLY OPEN-SOURCED
HOLY SHIT
@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world I'm surprised they didn't lose the source code
@icantcode @GlitchyZorua Only some of it, it seems.
@GlitchyZorua It's just 4.x.
The one the world remembers is 6.x
@GlitchyZorua Have you visited https://www.freedos.org/? and it's not just for reference.
@GlitchyZorua
it was licensed under MIT before though, wasn't it?
@GlitchyZorua @Bugspriet Finally, the German government can go full FOSS!
@GlitchyZorua
I hope we see 6.22 at some point. And dare I say, old Windows?
@GlitchyZorua it is for a while
@CamstoneFaux @GlitchyZorua I seens it! Very nifty.
@GlitchyZorua Open sourced and MIT licensed!
@GlitchyZorua 7.0 when T_T
@GlitchyZorua without the corresponding gwbasic though
@GlitchyZorua And it's under an MIT license!
@GlitchyZorua "But does it run MS-DOS?"
Microsoft *owns GitHub* and even they can't turn off a repo's pull requests. I guess the technology for that is actually impossible.
“[…] please don’t send Pull Requests suggesting any modifications to the source files”
@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world and also that weird multitasking dos 4.0 beta it seems
@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world actually no that's just the binaries, still kinda cool to have a barely official release
@GlitchyZorua not directly true - only Version 4.0 was released just now.
1.25 and 2.0 were released in 2018.
@GlitchyZorua now compile it with free software.
@GlitchyZorua @graydon [octodon.social]
Not DOS 3.x? Not DOS 5.x? Not the 2 DOS versions I've actually run?
What a strange line to draw. I wonder what the significance is.
@GlitchyZorua Well, whew. Now I don't need to worry about hiding my diskettes from the feds.
@GlitchyZorua Wow literally MINUTES from me talking about how it'll be difficult to make a custom OS (for a project I'm working on)
@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world
congratulations to @starfrost@wetdry.world and the great work of people at microsoft again!
@scruss @GlitchyZorua No GW-Basic? you mean like 4 years ago?
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/microsoft-open-sources-gw-basic/
(link to github repo in there)
@GlitchyZorua oh the flash backs..breaking up games into directories and hiding them from teachers
@GlitchyZorua making evryones screen saver over the local network mulder and scully
@GlitchyZorua digital life was so simple then
@GlitchyZorua no ads, just message boards curated to your own specifications or as we like to call it the fediverse
@GlitchyZorua Now we can finally check whether John Doe was right!!
@GlitchyZorua@wetdry.world this has been a thing for a while, but i think they recently added dos 4
@tauon yea lemme fix dat
@GlitchyZorua Microsoft employee here working on FOSS:
YAAAAY :3
@GlitchyZorua I hope they open-source 6.22. They probably don't because I think it's in use in some RTOS applications and also likely some encumbrances. You'd be surprised how many vendors have code in DOS.
Yes, DOS is often used as a real-time OS. It makes a lot of sense. If you don't have many TSR's running, it works great for that.
@GlitchyZorua DOS has been source-available for a number of years now, they just recently added 4.0.
idk why they haven't added 6.22 yet but there's probably some deps that prevent this
@sterophonick @GlitchyZorua it's funny cuz from what i have seen, MS-DOS 3, 5(.02) and 6(.20/22) were/are the more common used, so they literally released the ones that most peoples are not interested in
(also if i recall, they are not compilable in the version they are released, don't remember if it's because of the code, the license or both)